Candace Owens continues to assert her controversial claim that French First Lady Brigitte Macron was born male, even as the Macrons have initiated a lawsuit against her in Delaware. Simultaneously, Owens faces legal pressure involving a Blake Lively subpoena related to a separate case concerning a smear campaign allegation.
Owens Maintains Claims Despite Macron Lawsuit
Candace Owens has firmly refused to retract her statements concerning Brigitte Macron after the French First Lady and President Emmanuel Macron filed a defamation lawsuit in the United States. Owens responded on her podcast, accusing the Macrons of attempting to manipulate the U.S. legal system, and reiterated her assertion that Brigitte Macron was “born a man.”
In her remarks, Owens suggested the lawsuit itself was defamatory and hinted that former President Donald Trump might support her position. She declared,
We would be required to depose Donald Trump.
Owens also claimed that Trump personally called her, saying the Macrons had asked him to intervene and stop her from making these statements.
The Macrons’ lawsuit alleges Owens made these claims to boost her public profile and generate income, stating,
to promote her independent platform, gain notoriety and make money.
Despite this, Owens dismissed the suit as a catastrophic PR strategy.
During a recent podcast episode, Owens did not hold back, saying to Brigitte Macron,
You were born a man and you will die a man… That’s the point I’m making.
She continued with harsh personal attacks, calling the First Lady,
I think you’re sick. I think you’re disgusting.
Owens finished with a defiant promise:
And I am fully prepared to take on this battle on behalf of the entire world… On behalf of the entire world, I will see you in court.
Beyond this lawsuit, Owens is also embroiled in legal complications stemming from a subpoena issued by actress Blake Lively. Lively is seeking information related to her allegations against actor Justin Baldoni, who she claims orchestrated a smear campaign involving content creators, including Owens.
Previous Legal Battles Against Brigitte Macron’s Gender Claims
Candace Owens is not the first individual to face legal action for claiming Brigitte Macron was born male. Previously, two French women, spiritual medium Amandine Roy and independent journalist Natacha Rey, were sued by the Macrons after spreading similar stories involving Brigitte Macron and Jean-Michel Trogneux.
Initially, a French lower court found Roy and Rey guilty of libel and ordered them to pay €8,000 in damages. However, this verdict was overturned by the Paris Appeals Court, which ruled that the two defendants had acted in good faith and no longer needed to pay fines.
The Macrons are pursuing further appeals in higher French courts. Their U.S. lawsuit against Owens echoes this prior case, labeling her accusations as outlandish, defamatory and far-fetched fictions. The complaint reads:
The clicks kept coming, so Owens kept going, seizing every opportunity to promote her salacious claims. Rather than engage with President and Mrs Macron’s attempts to set the record straight, Owens mocked them and used them as additional fodder for her frenzied fan base.
The Macrons have filed 22 counts against Owens and are seeking a jury trial along with significant financial damages, mirroring the demands in the French litigation. Despite the earlier court setbacks in France, Owens appears undeterred, bolstered by the overturned convictions of the previous defendants.
Candace Owens Reacts to Blake Lively’s Subpoena in Smear Campaign Case
Candace Owens also publicly addressed the subpoena she received from Blake Lively, connected to Lively’s lawsuit alleging a smear campaign orchestrated by Justin Baldoni. Owens shared portions of her private text messages on a live podcast to demonstrate her transparency amid the legal scrutiny.
In her podcast, Owens humorously remarked that she considered subpoenaing herself during the session as she sifted through her messages for any mention of Blake Lively. Her search revealed two relevant texts predating Lively’s December 2024 lawsuit.
The earliest text, dated January 3, 2019, was a lighthearted conversation with her friend Christy about Lively’s wedding ring. Owens read aloud:
I say, ‘Blake Lively’s’, with the heart eyes. And she writes back, ‘This is a pink diamond and it’s flawless.’ Oh my god, lock me up, Judge Liman. I said something nice about Blake Lively in 2019.
The second message came from August 2024 and was between Owens and her producer, Skyler, where they discussed mentioning Blake Lively’s recent promotional missteps on her podcast. The text stated:
We should cover Blake Lively as well. Very viral at the moment.
Owens described her reaction after the lawsuit became public earlier this year, saying:
I truly looked at this lawsuit when it all came out in January, okay? And I just thought that you were a bad person. Truly, that was from the bottom of my heart. I think you and Ryan are bad people. There is nobody involved.
She also explained that her information originated from an anonymous tip line she created after the lawsuit and emphasized her need to protect her journalistic sources. Notably, Blake Lively has subpoenaed other content creators including Perez Hilton, Andy Signore, Zack Peter, and Kjersti Flaa as part of her investigation.
Implications and Legal Challenges Ahead
This intense legal conflict puts Candace Owens at the center of two heated disputes: the defamation lawsuit from the Macrons and the Blake Lively subpoena tied to allegations against Justin Baldoni. Owens’s defiant stance in the Macron case signals prolonged litigation ahead, especially considering the Macrons’ persistence after setbacks in French courts.
The overlap with the Blake Lively subpoena further complicates Owens’s legal landscape, potentially prolonging courtroom battles while drawing increased public attention. These intertwined controversies demonstrate how digital platforms and public figures increasingly collide in legal arenas, highlighting the risks and consequences tied to high-profile allegations and social media discourse.
As this story develops, the outcomes could influence not only Owens’s credibility and financial standing but also set precedents regarding online speech, defamation claims, and the role of digital subpoenas in celebrity legal disputes.
Our Reader’s Queries
Q. Is Blake Lively a Nepo baby?
A. She doesn’t show off her Hollywood family background, but it’s a big part of her story. Even though she didn’t become famous early or through obvious family connections, her path to fame wasn’t entirely by chance.
Q. What does Blake Lively weigh?
A. Starting at 203 pounds, she put in consistent effort over 14 months to achieve her goal of 143 pounds. Her journey was not just for appearance—it was about regaining her vitality, self-belief, and well-being.
Q. Did Blake Lively have surgery?
A. In 2024, Taylor Swift’s weight is 58 kilograms, which is about 127.868 pounds.
