Renowned actor Robin Williams, who was also celebrated for his memorable roles in dramatic films such as Good Will Hunting and Awakenings, maintained a vibrant comedic presence offscreen. Ethan Hawke recently disclosed how their working relationship on the 1989 film Dead Poets Society was marked by an unusual tension centered on laughter. During filming, Williams portrayed John Keating, a charismatic teacher inspiring his students, including Hawke’s character, to embrace new perspectives. However, Hawke’s refusal to laugh at Williams’ jokes on set reportedly drove the comedian to frustration.
Hawke, then 18 years old, explained on The Rich Eisen Show that the reported animosity was indeed real but stemmed from his deliberate choice to stay in character. He insisted that his role would not find Keating’s antics amusing, reflecting the student’s nervous response rather than genuine humor. By withholding laughter, Hawke aimed to fully embody his character’s emotional state, unaware that this decision affected Williams profoundly.
How Hawke’s Silence Affected Williams’ Energetic Presence
Williams was known for his ability to read a room and channel his energy toward those who responded to him. Hawke recalled,
“My character would not find any of Mr. Keating’s antics funny,”
emphasizing that his quiet demeanor made Williams fixated on him. He observed that
“He’d be too nervous Robin, he’s one of those people he could sense anybody in the room, if you weren’t laughing, all energy went to you until you were laughing. He’d make fun of you.”
Despite finding Williams’ jokes hilarious, Hawke saw laughing on camera as a professional lapse.
“Because I was just trying to do a good job, and so I would see (laughing) as a failure,”
he added. This resistance eventually “made him insane,” Hawke said, noting,
“So he was just mocking me constantly.”
This unusual interaction reveals Williams’ passionate and playful approach to engagement with his co-stars.
Williams’ Clever Humor Amid Tough Shoots
Among the many jokes Williams made, one of his favorites played on the film’s central theme—the Latin phrase carpe diem. Hawke fondly remembered,
“My favorite at the time was ‘carpe per diem,’”
a pun that poked fun at their on-location accommodation. He explained,
“Because we were all living in Delaware, and we were staying in some low-rent Marriott and Robin would make everybody laugh by (asking about) what they were doing with their per diem. And then, instead of carpe diem, he’d say ‘Carpe per diem. Can I have yours?’”
This humorous riff lightened the mood on a challenging project and highlighted Williams’ sharp wit.
The Lasting Impact of Their Professional Relationship
Though Hawke’s reserve tested Williams’ patience, the legendary actor remained supportive of the young talent’s career. Williams went beyond their on-set interactions by helping Hawke secure professional representation. Hawke recounted,
“He helped me get an agent. And that felt really good,”
revealing that Williams had spoken highly of him to his contacts, which led to a meeting with a prospective agent. This endorsement was invaluable to Hawke’s early career growth.
Sadly, the actors never had the opportunity to collaborate again, as plans for a sequel titled Dead Poets Society II: Keating’s Revenge never materialized. Nevertheless, their unique connection during the original film remains a poignant example of the complexities behind celebrated performances, where creative tension and mutual respect coexist.
Why This Behind-the-Scenes Story Matters
This account of Ethan Hawke and Robin Williams on the set of Dead Poets Society sheds light on how acting demands can influence interpersonal dynamics during production. The intense focus required to inhabit a character sometimes contrasts sharply with an actor’s personal or off-screen persona, which can lead to unexpected challenges, even among acclaimed performers.
For fans of Ethan Hawke Robin Williams, this story enriches the understanding of their craft and dedication. It also illustrates how Williams’ relentless energy and generosity left a lasting impression, even when met with resistance. Their interaction underscores the complex layers involved in filmmaking and the delicate balance between maintaining professionalism and fostering creative spontaneity.
