The highly anticipated Henry Cavill Highlander remake is set to resurrect the cult classic with director Chad Stahelski at the helm, aiming to modernize the story for a new audience. However, the project must overcome significant challenges involving fan skepticism and the original film’s troubled legacy that continues to haunt the franchise decades after its 1986 debut.
The Original Highlander’s Complex Legacy and Cult Status
Released in 1986, Highlander introduced audiences to Connor MacLeod, an immortal Scottish warrior vulnerable only to beheading. Despite featuring an intriguing blend of fantasy, action, and moody sci-fi influences reminiscent of films like The Terminator, its initial theatrical run was a failure, grossing less than $6 million domestically. The film’s perplexing plot, combined with a relentless music-video style, made it difficult for general viewers to embrace, restricting its appeal to a small, dedicated fanbase.
Christopher Lambert, cast as MacLeod, was a relatively unknown actor whose intense, brooding performance failed to attract mainstream attention. Meanwhile, Sean Connery’s role as Ramirez, an Egyptian immortal mentor, provided star power but occurred during a lull in Connery’s career before his resurgence with The Untouchables in 1987. Over time, Highlander found renewed life through cable television and home video, developing a cult following akin to John Carpenter’s Big Trouble in Little China.

This niche admiration solidified Highlander’s status as a cult classic known for being “so-bad-it’s-good,” which has led some to overestimate the size of the audience interested in a remake. The film’s complex mythology and unusual tone, while intriguing to existing followers, pose a significant barrier to attracting new viewers unfamiliar with the series.
Franchise Sequels Struggle to Maintain Audience and Credibility
The Highlander franchise has struggled to expand beyond its core fans, with multiple sequels failing to restore its credibility. The 1991 sequel, Highlander II: The Quickening, is often cited as one of the worst films ever made, bringing the franchise’s reputation to a low point despite earning $15.5 million domestically. Its failure foreshadowed the underwhelming box-office returns of subsequent entries.
Highlander III: The Sorcerer (1995) and Highlander: Endgame (2000) each earned approximately $12 million at the domestic box office but failed to revive widespread interest amidst largely negative reviews. While the series briefly found success on television with Highlander: The Series (1992-1998), starring Adrian Paul, the ongoing downward trend in theatrical appeal has entrenched the franchise’s niche status.
The Upcoming Remake Faces Divided Fandom and Industry Hurdles
The forthcoming Highlander remake must navigate a precarious balance between attracting a modern audience and satisfying longtime followers who often view the original as an untouchable classic. Fans remain divided over Henry Cavill’s casting as Connor MacLeod, with criticism mainly targeting his more muscular physique compared to Lambert’s leaner portrayal, which some argue affects the character’s iconic look.
Cavill’s post-Superman career has seen inconsistent success, with few roles matching the global recognition he earned in the DC Extended Universe. This raises questions about whether his star power alone can drive box-office success for a remake of a franchise with limited mainstream appeal. Despite the involvement of a skilled cast and Chad Stahelski’s direction, the project confronts the difficult reality that revitalizing certain cult films can be an uphill battle.
Meanwhile, fans can still watch the original Highlander on streaming platforms such as Tubi, preserving its place as a distinctive, if controversial, piece of 1980s fantasy action cinema.
