At the 2026 Golden Globes, Pamela Anderson expressed strong discomfort around Seth Rogen due to his release of the Hulu miniseries Pam & Tommy, which portrayed a highly personal chapter of her life without her consent. The actress’s uneasy feelings toward Rogen highlight the sensitive nature of the show’s subject matter and its impact on her well-being.
Anderson’s Discomfort at Seeing Rogen at the Award Show
During an interview on Andy Cohen’s SiriusXM Radio Andy, Pamela Anderson shared her experience at the Golden Globes ceremony on January 11. When asked if she encountered Seth Rogen at the event, she confirmed they were physically close, stating,
“He was in the pit at the Golden Globes so we were close.”
Despite this proximity, Anderson disclosed feeling unsettled seeing Rogen after the release of Pam & Tommy. She described this feeling plainly:
“I may have just felt like, ’I’m not chopped liver over here,’”
adding,
“I don’t know. It just felt like a little yucky.”
Frustration Over Lack of Permission for the Series
Pamela Anderson voiced strong displeasure about the series being produced without her involvement or consent. She revealed,
“He did that [series] without talking to me,”
emphasizing the personal violation she felt from this decision. She questioned,
“Like how can someone make a TV series out of the difficult times in your life, and ‘I’m a living, breathing human being over here. Hello.’”
Although Anderson hopes the producer might eventually “reach out” and “apologize,” she acknowledged that such an apology might not be significant to her now. When Cohen suggested that an apology might carry meaning, she responded with a guarded observation about public life:
“Well, you are free game. When you are a public person they say you have no right to privacy.”
Boundaries and Privacy in Personal Tragedies
The actress made it clear that her most private struggles and darkest moments should not be exploited as entertainment material. She stated insightfully,
“Your darkest, deepest secrets or your tragedies in your life shouldn’t be fair game for [a] TV series.”
This invasion of privacy left her feeling upset, confessing,
“That p***ed me off a little bit.”
Despite these emotions, Pamela Anderson is now in a more peaceful phase of life and prefers not to reopen past wounds, signaling a desire for respect and closure rather than ongoing conflict over the series.
Implications for Personal Privacy and Public Storytelling
Anderson’s criticism of Rogen’s unauthorized series underscores the tension between public figures’ privacy and the entertainment industry’s drive to dramatize real-life stories. Her unease reveals the complicated emotional cost of sharing personal experiences through semi-fictionalized adaptations. How producers, actors, and audiences navigate these boundaries could influence future portrayals of sensitive subjects in media.
The unresolved conflict between Anderson and Rogen may prompt discussions about consent and respect in storytelling, potentially encouraging more collaborative approaches when depicting real individuals’ lives. Meanwhile, Anderson’s insistence on privacy highlights the need for balancing public interest with personal dignity in biographical projects.
