Kristen Stewart has faced significant ridicule after urging people to stop eating burgers as a protest against the deportation of illegal immigrants in the United States. The 35-year-old actress made this unusual appeal during an event in West Hollywood celebrating the latest issue of Architectural Digest on Tuesday, drawing widespread puzzlement and criticism.
Stewart’s comments emerged after she was asked what she would miss if it disappeared from Los Angeles. She responded by emphasizing the importance of immigrants in shaping her identity and lamented the erosion of immigrant culture through current deportation policies.
Immigration and Cultural Concerns Highlighted by Stewart
In her statement, Stewart said,
“Immigrants. I can’t stand the idea of the dismantling of the culture that had a hand in making me who I am, which is so meaningless in the face of people’s lives being completely unearthed and destroyed.”
She expressed deep distress over the situation, saying it did not represent the values she associates with her community.
The actress revealed her personal anguish by explaining she was “dying every day” thinking about ways to offer support for those affected. It was within this context that she suggested unusual methods to take action, including stopping the daytime purchase of burgers as a form of protest.
Confusion and Online Backlash Over Boycott Proposal
Stewart’s unique call to
“stop buying burgers in the daytime”
quickly became the focus of a viral clip on X (formerly Twitter), where it garnered over one million views and a flood of mocking responses. Numerous social media users questioned the connection between purchasing burgers and halting immigration enforcement.
One user asked bluntly,
“What in the hell does not buying burgers during the day even mean?”
Another sarcastically noted,
“So her big plan is… skip In-N-Out at lunch? Bold strategy. Meanwhile the rest of us are just trying to afford rent in the city immigrants actually keep running.”
Further comments practically dismissed the idea as ineffective activism, with one person stating,
“The protest against illegal immigration enforcement is… Not buying burgers during the day? No tariff pressure. No legislative push. No voter registration drive. No legal fund.”
Another added,
“Just: skip lunch. Hollywood activism has truly reached its final form.”
The skepticism extended to skepticism over the real-world impact of the boycott, as many doubted how avoiding daytime burger consumption could influence immigration policies or enforcement agencies such as ICE.
One of the dumbest ideas for protest I’ve ever heard.
?Sixth, social media user
Stewart’s Appearance and Earlier Reflections on Princess Diana
At the same West Hollywood event, Kristen Stewart showcased her slim figure, wearing a haltered white satin bralette paired with tailored white trousers. Her look was completed with loose brunette hair, a simple silver chain necklace, and a white leather bomber jacket.
Beyond her controversial remarks on immigration, Stewart also shared insight into her emotional connection with the late Princess Diana. Having portrayed the Princess of Wales in the 2021 psychological drama film Spencer, Stewart recently disclosed feeling “haunted” by Diana’s memory whenever she drives through cities like London or Paris.
Speaking about this ongoing emotional response, Stewart told the Daily Telegraph,
“I still am. I can’t drive round this city, and Paris for that matter, without thinking about her. All the love that poured out of this woman… I can cry about her at any moment.”
The Challenges of Portraying Princess Diana
Stewart admitted she initially doubted her casting as Diana, telling director Pablo Larrain he was “insane” to pick her and asking him to consider another actress. She cited physical differences, such as eye color—her green eyes versus Diana’s iconic blue—to express her concern.
Should we make the engagement ring green, then?
?Kristen Stewart
However, Larrain insisted that Stewart focus on capturing Diana’s spirit rather than physical traits.
You really must detach from those things – this is about spirit.
?Pablo Larrain, director
Implications of Stewart’s Statements and Cultural Impact
Kristen Stewart’s comments on immigration and her unusual burger boycott proposal have sparked debate about the efficacy and symbolism of celebrity activism in social issues. While her passion for protecting immigrant communities resonates with some, her suggested methods have led to widespread skepticism and mockery online.
The backlash reflects broader frustrations surrounding discussions of immigration enforcement and protests. Critics argue that impactful activism requires more concrete actions, such as policy reform efforts, legal aid, or voter engagement, rather than symbolic gestures that can appear disconnected from the realities of the issues.
Stewart’s ongoing public reflections on her roles and personal convictions suggest she continues to grapple with how to use her platform effectively. Her emotional connection to Princess Diana also reveals a deeper awareness of the complexities involved in portraying real-life figures and addressing societal pain through art.
As the conversation around immigration and celebrity activism unfolds, Stewart’s remarks may push audiences to scrutinize the intentions and strategies behind public protests, while continuing the dialogue on how best to support vulnerable communities amid challenging political climates.
