New evidence has emerged in the Blake Lively legal battle update, shedding light on her involvement in editing decisions for the film It Ends with Us. Text messages from April 2024 exchanged between the movie’s editors suggest that Lively exercised considerable influence over which intimate scenes were included in the final version of the film.
On August 1, court documents revealed conversations among crew members discussing how certain scenes, particularly those involving sensitive content, required Lively’s approval before any modifications could be made. The messages indicate that the actress not only controlled scenes featuring herself but also those involving Isabela Ferrer, who portrayed a younger version of her character, Lily.
Details of Control Over Key Scenes in the Film
In one portion of the text chain, an individual known as Henny Grace explained that Blake Lively
“wasn’t part of writing that sex scene and didn’t want a character depicting her to have sex in high school.”
This remark points to Lively’s insistence on controlling the portrayal of her character’s younger self, emphasizing her influence over sensitive storytelling elements. The same source noted that “it’s all about control.” These messages were introduced by Lively’s legal team as part of her sexual harassment lawsuit against co-star Justin Baldoni, underscoring the importance of these decisions in the broader legal context.
The text chain was submitted as a sealed exhibit to US District Judge Lewis Liman, who is overseeing the case. This move was made to facilitate a subpoena for Robb Sullivan, another individual mentioned within the conversations.
Progress of the Legal Proceedings and Upcoming Trial Dates
The lawsuit continues to advance, with Blake Lively recently undergoing a deposition in the presence of Justin Baldoni. Both parties are preparing for a federal trial scheduled to begin on March 9, 2026, in Manhattan. This trial will likely address not only the allegations of harassment but also how Lively’s control over the film’s content factors into the dispute.
The new insights from the text messages reveal the depth of Lively’s involvement behind the scenes and may influence the outcome of the case by illustrating her authority within the production. As the legal process unfolds, these details contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the conflict between the two actors, setting the stage for further developments in the months ahead.
